Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 0:43:52 GMT -5
One universal day I thought of a magical and strange problem to illustrate the myths of life. I imagined a being destroying entropy in a world surrounded by fire and smoke molecules. From entropic collapse, sublimated spirits emerge that cross the time barrier, creating energy from nothing. Yellow radiations recall the primordial chaos of the molecular eternity of atomic orbitals. Like a miracle, perpetual mobiles return and ancient beings are reborn from the flow of entropy. Supremely, I perceive resurrection and life on the edges of heat death.” José Iraides Belandria, Quantum Stories. universe One of the most famous metaphors about the entropy of the universe is found in Borges' History of Eternity. Heat and light are forms of energy: light is converted to heat, but heat is not converted to light. This evidence invalidates the Eternal Return or cyclical transformation of matter, reaching an extreme point in which all light ends and only heat remains. The point of least balance between forces. The second law of thermodynamics states that the universe tends towards disorder and irreversibility and ultimately heat death. Given this scenario, there are two possible endings: the Big Crunch or hot death (point at which the universe contracts and implodes) or the Big Rip or cold death (point at which the universe expands eternally and the flow of energy ceases.
However, let us not despair. There are still eons for this to happen. brand strategy The law of thermal inequality helps us explain some of the things that worry us. There are at least two principles that compete in our daily lives and in the future of companies. The Gauss Function and the Stevens Potential Function. The first is in the shape of a mound, the majority are located in the center, as in the population age curve. The second takes the form of an infinite mound, in which a few share the majority and a few share the minority. Gaussian distribution Industry Email List illustration In Alfons Cornella's Celebrating Curiosity conference, this point is addressed from a business perspective, linking it to efficiency. Organizations with more resources to scale their efficiency absorb more market share and oligopolist sectors. Alfonocultures.” From a social point of view, it seems appropriate that the graph of competition between brands is that of Gauss. Many companies compete on equal terms and share the market share equitably, the levers of differentiation disappear, no one gains an advantage over anyone and the point of balance between supply and demand is achieved.
This is a paradigm considered ideal by some of the economic principles that have governed the world economy since Adam Smith. However, it has a dangerous side. In a paradigm of absolute equality between competitors, the share is shared, but so are the benefits from the commoditization of products. In an extreme equilibrium scenario, the profit would be zero, so the market would go into technical bankruptcy and companies with lower current assets (liquidity) would disappear, generating a new imbalance between supply and demand (second law of thermodynamics). Although it may seem incredible, the most advantageous paradigm for everyone is that of Stevens. In this paradigm, a few companies, the strongest, absorb a large portion of the market, limiting the entry of new competitors and causing the rest to reinvent themselves. This last path is what Peter Thiel supports in his From Zero to One, in which he develops the need to generate new market categories to avoid the paradigm of thermal death of organizations. brand strategy When a company innovates in a transformational way, it generates a new category in which - for the moment - only it exists. It is the growth stage of the classic product life cycle.
However, let us not despair. There are still eons for this to happen. brand strategy The law of thermal inequality helps us explain some of the things that worry us. There are at least two principles that compete in our daily lives and in the future of companies. The Gauss Function and the Stevens Potential Function. The first is in the shape of a mound, the majority are located in the center, as in the population age curve. The second takes the form of an infinite mound, in which a few share the majority and a few share the minority. Gaussian distribution Industry Email List illustration In Alfons Cornella's Celebrating Curiosity conference, this point is addressed from a business perspective, linking it to efficiency. Organizations with more resources to scale their efficiency absorb more market share and oligopolist sectors. Alfonocultures.” From a social point of view, it seems appropriate that the graph of competition between brands is that of Gauss. Many companies compete on equal terms and share the market share equitably, the levers of differentiation disappear, no one gains an advantage over anyone and the point of balance between supply and demand is achieved.
This is a paradigm considered ideal by some of the economic principles that have governed the world economy since Adam Smith. However, it has a dangerous side. In a paradigm of absolute equality between competitors, the share is shared, but so are the benefits from the commoditization of products. In an extreme equilibrium scenario, the profit would be zero, so the market would go into technical bankruptcy and companies with lower current assets (liquidity) would disappear, generating a new imbalance between supply and demand (second law of thermodynamics). Although it may seem incredible, the most advantageous paradigm for everyone is that of Stevens. In this paradigm, a few companies, the strongest, absorb a large portion of the market, limiting the entry of new competitors and causing the rest to reinvent themselves. This last path is what Peter Thiel supports in his From Zero to One, in which he develops the need to generate new market categories to avoid the paradigm of thermal death of organizations. brand strategy When a company innovates in a transformational way, it generates a new category in which - for the moment - only it exists. It is the growth stage of the classic product life cycle.